BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 News
 National News
 Un-bloody-believable

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Enter Anti SPAM Code: Please enter this code in the box below. If you cannot read it refresh the page. Click here for more detailed instructions.Play Sound
Click here to refresh this page
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Insert youTube videoInsert Windows Media AudioInsert Windows Media VideoInsert Macromedia FlashInsert Google Video
   
Message Icon:              
             
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Pelagia Posted - 14/08/2007 : 22:11:45
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1279891,00.html

If they are such a danger to children, why are they not still behind bars?
14   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
thedelboy Posted - 19/08/2007 : 09:53:26
it reminds me of the poor Mormon fellow Kirk Anderson,he was sexually abused by a former Mormon woman I forget her name(but she was very tasty)I kept trying to find out which prison she was in so II could send her my addressI was GRAPED once,It was by a bunch of them
Miriam Binder Posted - 19/08/2007 : 08:42:28
Exactly ... and don't for one moment think that just because they are female that the abuse is less horrific.
Daveb Posted - 19/08/2007 : 07:43:44
Castration, chemical or otherwise maybe ok for a male.
What if the paedophile happens to be female?
Fluffy Sheep Posted - 18/08/2007 : 23:38:44
Hey Moon, I though I was the Big Softie - I`m all for helping to Reform folks (not that I believe prison is always the best answer because the inmates become a sub-set of society, and make contacts, learn more about crime from each other, etc.)
Reform thieves, and if it fails, it`s property that is lost.
Reform drug or alcohol abusers and if it fails, they harm themselves - ok, and those they might be supplying/encouraging to follow.
Reform paedophiles - and fail....NOT an acceptable option. They should be tagged, and if it works for stray ing dogs why shouldn`t it work for them?
moon23 Posted - 16/08/2007 : 11:18:23
quote:
Originally posted by Fluffy Sheep

I don`t believe it is right to execute criminals, however tempting that solution may sometimes seem.
The chipping/tagging of paedophiles and others is a restriction on THEIR civil Liberties - but so is prison, and there they cost more to keep.
Letting these folks roam at large is a greater restriction on other folks` Civil Liberties than chipping them could ever be!



Yea but Chipping dosn't work. Anyone who has used a GPS sat nav will tell you how dodgy the equipment can be. When this is outsourced to private compaines to run the scheme then it's a recipie for disaster.

We'd be better off improving the prision service so it wasn't over-flowing and run by rubbish US compaines. Then it could also help reform people as well as punish them
Miriam Binder Posted - 15/08/2007 : 18:44:54
Personally I am all for minimising jail sentences as they achieve very little indeed. I do believe that the community has a right to know who is in their midst as I think that societal disapprobation would be far more effective then any other form of intervention. The problem is twofold however ... communities are not responsible enough to restrict themselves to ostracising and vigilantism is too great a danger.

I am a great advocate of civil liberties however I also firmly believe that transgressing the code of civil behaviour means that you can be considered as having foregone your right to civil liberty.
Fluffy Sheep Posted - 15/08/2007 : 18:34:44
I don`t believe it is right to execute criminals, however tempting that solution may sometimes seem.
The chipping/tagging of paedophiles and others is a restriction on THEIR civil Liberties - but so is prison, and there they cost more to keep.
Letting these folks roam at large is a greater restriction on other folks` Civil Liberties than chipping them could ever be!
moon23 Posted - 15/08/2007 : 15:37:05
quote:
Originally posted by Daveb

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6947744.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6947278.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6945455.stm

Not barbaric at all really!



Yes, I guess I mean that the state isn't as barbaric as it was. Modern consumerist society shits all over community values and promotes selfish hateful individuals that commit these crimes.
Daveb Posted - 15/08/2007 : 13:41:48
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6947744.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6947278.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6945455.stm

Not barbaric at all really!
moon23 Posted - 15/08/2007 : 13:32:37
quote:
Originally posted by Daveb

Hanging is the best treatment.



No that's state murder, not treatment. Thankfully we are not that barbaric a nation anymore.
Daveb Posted - 15/08/2007 : 13:29:56
Hanging is the best treatment.
moon23 Posted - 15/08/2007 : 11:39:49
quote:
Originally posted by Fluffy Sheep

No, behind bars isn`t the answer, but why aren`t they tagged, chipped, or whatever? Because folks who want to keep society safe from the damage these types can do are also scared about any further encroachment on our so-called `civil liberties`. We can`t have it both ways, can we!



You can only do so much to restrict people's Liberty as you do have to balance the need of security against our civil liberties.

There also needs to be more treatment to help people who seek to pray on children.
Pelagia Posted - 15/08/2007 : 09:52:05
Castration might be an option, chemical or otherwise; preferably otherwise.
Fluffy Sheep Posted - 14/08/2007 : 23:50:22
No, behind bars isn`t the answer, but why aren`t they tagged, chipped, or whatever? Because folks who want to keep society safe from the damage these types can do are also scared about any further encroachment on our so-called `civil liberties`. We can`t have it both ways, can we!

BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free