BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 News
 National News
 Coal - no longer a fuel of the past?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Enter Anti SPAM Code: Please enter this code in the box below. If you cannot read it refresh the page. Click here for more detailed instructions.Play Sound
Click here to refresh this page
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Insert youTube videoInsert Windows Media AudioInsert Windows Media VideoInsert Macromedia FlashInsert Google Video
   
Message Icon:              
             
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Miriam Binder Posted - 10/03/2008 : 08:34:04
or "Throwing down the gauntlet?"
quote:
John Hutton, the Secretary of State for Business, will say that "clean coal" has a crucial role to play in filling Britain's energy gap for the future. He will accuse the green lobby of "gesture politics" by opposing any coal-fired plants, putting energy supplies at risk and presenting a false "black and white" choice to the public over coal.
here

I could be wrong of course but I was under the impression that Maggie closed down the coal mines because they were considered no longer viable. (That and because she enjoyed 'fronting up' to the miners lobby) ...

Now there is the additional environmental concern regarding the pollution that needs to be taken into consideration. We have polarised views again; when don't we . So here you have the government on the one hand claiming that coal can be a 'clean fuel' and the environmental lobby claiming the opposite. I'll admit to a failure to see the argument that China is investing heavily in coal as being persuasive. Mainly because I do not think that China is a standard to try and emulate in either environmental or other social issues.
2   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Daveb Posted - 10/03/2008 : 20:23:56
Maybe just a ploy?
If we cannot have nuclear then you got to have coal.

If the mines had not been closed in the 80s then it may all be gone by now?
So perhaps the coal was just being saved for the future?

The bonus for Mrs T was smashing the unions in the process.
thedelboy Posted - 10/03/2008 : 09:57:36
coal can obviously cause smog etc but if it is cooked in a coke oven to remove the impurities it becomes a clean carbon,the mines were only closed due to mrs Thatcher and Arthur Scargill being more interested in thier own interests than "Facts".Coal could be a cheap fuel ,there is still billions of tons available in the uk but my worry would be the expense of drying out cleaning out the old pits;also the environmentalists have a point I remember the Slag heaps in methil Scotland burying houses I believe that there was also a terrible tragedy in Abergavenny Wales .So this should be considered from all angles

BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free