| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| long time no see |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 22:29:55
Langham got 10 months,
he will be out in 4 or 5 months.
That Stinks.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1284082,00.html |
| 19 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| long time no see |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 12:16:03
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
Langham got 10 months,
he will be out in 4 or 5 months.
That Stinks.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1284082,00.html
The Issue is very Clear
|
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 11:45:18
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
What a pathetic childish comment.
Grow up.
What a pathetic thread when you don't even want to discuss the issue you yourself raised. |
| long time no see |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 11:42:08
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder
Wow ... you listen to the news and watch it as well as read it. Congratulations!
What a pathetic childish comment.
Grow up. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 11:22:51
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
This is from the TV news
not papers.
Wow ... you listen to the news and watch it as well as read it. Congratulations! |
| long time no see |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 10:19:04
This is from the TV news
not papers. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 10:17:33
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
Fits for you, only,
you are doing the same backtrack again.
Langham got a light sentance.
So what you are actually saying is that you are not interested in discussing it but you just want to let us all know you read the papers. |
| long time no see |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 10:11:43
Fits for you, only,
you are doing the same backtrack again.
Langham got a light sentence. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 09:54:35
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
For Sure Langham
did not get a full sentance.
As for my recollect
why would I - this thread is about Langham.
Every thread you go on
all you do is go off subject.
The subject was the sentencing for someone who was found guilty of downloading and viewing abuse images. That fits in nicely with what Pete Townshend was found guilty of. That is not off subject at all LTNS. |
| long time no see |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 09:23:45
For Sure Langham
did not get a full sentance.
As for my recollect
why would I - this thread is about Langham.
Every thread you go on
all you do is go off subject. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 16/09/2007 : 09:04:36
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
Again this thread ain't about me,
all you seem to do, Miriam, is back track and attack posters.
It is no wonder not many are on this site.
To be sure, this thread isn't about you LTNS. You made a claim at the start of this thread that a sentence stinks. I reminded you that on a previous occasion you did not appear to hold a similar view. I asked you why you thought differently this time.
You then to start attacking my mental processes by claiming that I was confused ... rather a habit of yours as you have on previous occasions attacked my morals as well as my ability to recollect.
So if anyone is guilty of attacking LTNS it is your good self with me merely justifying my original question - which you still have not answered in any meaningful way by the way - and defending myself against your spurious claims. |
| long time no see |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:40:12
Again this thread ain't about me,
all you seem to do, Miriam, is back track and attack posters.
It is no wonder not many are on this site. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:36:33
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
Try to stay on Track - Miriam.
Oh, I am on track alright LTNS ... you are the one who is inconsistent with your proclamations sweetness. |
| long time no see |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:29:41
quote:
Originally posted by nightowl
What do you want LT, he's been convicted and sentenced to 10 months and probably will appear on the sex offenders register for some time.
His TV/ acting career now destroyed, I think he has been punished don't you, or do you want blood ?
Sure he is on the list , out of work.
But anyone else would have got a Longer time in Jail.
This thread is about Chris Langham
once again Miriam gets a old thread
but it ain't about Langham.
Try to stay on Track - Miriam. |
| nightowl |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:12:48
Yes, but Pete was doing it for research
Rather trust the courts in this matter.... |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:06:33
quote:
Originally posted by nightowl
What do you want LT, he's been convicted and sentenced to 10 months and probably will appear on the sex offenders register for some time.
His TV/ acting career now destroyed, I think he has been punished don't you, or do you want blood ?
He didn't want blood when it came to The Who's Pete Towshend. |
| nightowl |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 23:02:20
What do you want LT, he's been convicted and sentenced to 10 months and probably will appear on the sex offenders register for some time.
His TV/ acting career now destroyed, I think he has been punished don't you, or do you want blood ? |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 22:57:50
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
The Police have said these were Films
not just Images.
That Sentance is not long enough.
Whatever you are on about makes no sense to this thread.
Why do you backtrack
and get confused.
for your information LTNS, films are still images ... the only difference being that they are not still images but a running series of images.
As for my being confused ... try this. You explicitely state that watching images is a victimless crime.
long time no see Posted - 16/06/2007 : 16:51:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Victims
of the Guitar player.
Nothing like this Case.
|
| long time no see |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 22:41:32
The Police have said these were Films
not just Images.
That Sentence is not long enough.
Whatever you are on about makes no sense to this thread.
Why do you backtrack
and get confused. |
| Miriam Binder |
Posted - 15/09/2007 : 22:38:28
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see
Langham got 10 months,
he will be out in 4 or 5 months.
That Stinks.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1284082,00.html
I think we have had discussions about this before. I remember that at the time you held that there was a difference between people that looked at images and those that engaged in the abuse ... You claimed at the time that watching an image of abuse wasn't as bad as actually taking part in abuse. That still being so, why should this 'stink' as you so eloquently put it? |
