BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 News
 National News
 Prince Harry Fighting
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Next Page
Author Topic
Page: of 2

davidson
Alagaësía


5 Posts

Posted - 28/02/2008 :  20:41:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
http://www.fivetvonline.tv/your-news-story.php?news=169



Due to another country leaking this news
it is now confirmed Prince Harry is part of the Army Fighting,
and the Queen was the first to tell him.
So the Royals in the UK may be now bigger targets
by Terrorists that do not want this.


Edited by - davidson on 28/02/2008 23:33:16

camelot
Barsoom



USA
294 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  00:16:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I know there is another topic on this somewhere....

But even so this is insane....I realise that many of you are not big fans of royalty but this situation is just unfair, even to my American eyes. It as if we painted a big red target on the lad's back. I was against his deployment from the beginning, and now it looks as if my worst fears could be realised. Pull him out now before you create another martyr...
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  01:46:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think I must agree with Camelot. It was one thing to let the boy do 'his bit' along with his fellow soldiers, it is another to let him carry on now.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

livewire
Forum Admin



89 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  01:48:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Don't think you are pulling the wool over my eyes long time no see.
Go to Top of Page

camelot
Barsoom



USA
294 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  03:28:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Off Topic
quote:
Originally posted by livewire

Don't think you are pulling the wool over my eyes long time no see.



He's not been voted off the island again, has he? I did not even notice the name on the post...just looked at the style and assumed it was LT.

Go to Top of Page

camelot
Barsoom



USA
294 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  03:35:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Back to topic...

Miriam it is not only the danger to the prince that should be considered, although that is sufficient in my mind, but also to those troops around him who now become targets simply because they are near him.
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  04:04:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I agree Camelot ... it is all very well for him to want to be just 'one of the boys' but the fact is that he isn't and there's an end to it.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  04:25:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Emergency plans to extract Prince Harry from Afghanistan were being drawn up last night after the news leaked that he had been on a secret combat tour in Helmand province since before Christmas.
here

And of course the boy has been an exemplary hero.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1166 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  08:36:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
If Prince Harry has been the "success" there that news feeds on the radio state, will we be told how many Taliban he has killed?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  08:39:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Would you believe them?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Fluffy Sheep
Discworld



1159 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  10:43:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Damned irresponsible media reporting doesn`t help. And these are supposed to be our `allies`??

Row faster, slaves! Caesar wants to waterski!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  10:54:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No Fluffy, they are journalists.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

gcrkfrd
Barsoom



USA
379 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  13:52:19  Show Profile  Send gcrkfrd an AOL message  Send gcrkfrd a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Was it not an Australian Weekly Magazine, that Spilled the Beans?

AMERICAN BY BIRTH, UNION BY CHOICE
Go to Top of Page

Fluffy Sheep
Discworld



1159 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  15:31:08  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I wish them many Boils and Pustules, whoever they were!

Row faster, slaves! Caesar wants to waterski!
Go to Top of Page

Tombstone Blues
Discworld



1935 Posts

Posted - 29/02/2008 :  16:16:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by gcrkfrd

Was it not an Australian Weekly Magazine, that Spilled the Beans?



An american news site:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-drudge-report-clever-headlines-and-eye-for-the-news-jugular-789485.html
Go to Top of Page

Anubis
Barsoom



231 Posts

Posted - 01/03/2008 :  08:53:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by gcrkfrd

Was it not an Australian Weekly Magazine, that Spilled the Beans?



Yes, it WAS an Aussie paper that broke the news -- but that's a minor point as the lad had had enough of his little media "tour" and members of his unit were openly publicizing his presence to their relatives to provide the excuse the bring him back having contrived the "new image" required ... So the camera crews arrived, filmed him firing a sub-machine gun he'd obviously not fired before (hence the instructor's helping presence), a few quick costume changes from the Prince for the cameras and then the contradictory tales of his various "assignments" which may sound credible to those who've never been in the army, Look closely at this well-shaven lad as you hear him tell how he's not washed for four days, listen watch carefully as you see him perform on the telephone "calling air strikes" and be grateful you aren't one of the allied combatants about to be hit by "friendly fire" (don't worry, it was only for the film) ... from the danger zone where his 'head-dress' carried the slogan "we do bad things to bad people". Lots of money ... all to fabricate a "hero" and turn a waste of space and money into a national institution. Prince Harry told us today, quite blandly, "I don't like England" .... listen to today's news services and hear him for yourself .... this is your "new" national "hero"!!!!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 01/03/2008 :  09:04:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
You've got to feel sorry for the poor blighter. What chance he for a normal life? Just like his father, groomed for life for a position he is unlikely to ever be able to take up.

As for national hero? Nah, not in my eyes ... just a rich kid playing on 'daddy's money and name' really. The Paris Hilton of Great Britain

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

camelot
Barsoom



USA
294 Posts

Posted - 01/03/2008 :  23:50:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The decision to send him was flawed from the outset. This outcome was inevitable in my opinion. Just like the Iraq war it was unnecessary, inflammatory, and probably based on the same macho thinking...
Go to Top of Page

Anubis
Barsoom



231 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  10:54:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by camelot

The decision to send him was flawed from the outset. This outcome was inevitable in my opinion. Just like the Iraq war it was unnecessary, inflammatory, and probably based on the same macho thinking...



The nonsense continues in today's (Sunday's) papers -- incredibly the Independent on Sunday makes its front-page story an (obviously ghosted) article by a Sandhurst graduate who can understand Prince Harry's excitement as he 'fires his sub-machine gun at a suspected Taliban stronghold' (replay the scene for yourself and you'll see Harry under instruction on a practice run). I wouldn't have expected such drivel from the Independent.

Regarding your point, Camelot, one of the better letters, from yesterday's Guardian, makes an intelligent proposal:

Go to Top of Page

NewMember
Barsoom



109 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  14:14:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think it was completely irresponsible to have sent him in the first place. Okay he is a Royal and yes he wanted to go. But isn't it right to treat any young man, or woman, regardless of status, the important lesson in life that you don't always get what you want?

"It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do" Jerome K. Jerome
Go to Top of Page

Fluffy Sheep
Discworld



1159 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  15:51:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
That`s a good summing up of the whole argument, NM!

Row faster, slaves! Caesar wants to waterski!
Go to Top of Page

Anubis
Barsoom



231 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  15:59:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NewMember

I think it was completely irresponsible to have sent him in the first place. Okay he is a Royal and yes he wanted to go. But isn't it right to treat any young man, or woman, regardless of status, the important lesson in life that you don't always get what you want?


Methinks you miss the point, New Member. We are talking about a publicity exercise. The situation had reached an all-time low in the years preceding the death of Harry's mother -- Diana was the standing joke of the nation, widely ridiculed throughout the media. Were you not alive at the time? There was barely a day, when one of her latest comments wasn't an easy joke for "Private Eye' or whatever. Then she got herself killed in Paris; at the last minute (literally) The Times pulled the latest "joke" at her expense, about to be featured on the front page, as the nation went into "mourning". The death was a manna from heaven so far as the status quo was concerned, the "Princess of Hearts" suddenly was transformed from a 'figure of fun' into a celebrity image.

When you have an idiot family, it's difficult to keep "the Firm" in place, what with Edward's ludicrous antics and, like his Dad, scraping into university with a questionable "E' grade A level. Harry, likewise, needing 'special assistance' to scrape his academic passes, and his drunken cavorting, it was felt, needed to be got away from the royal estates (to save the protected birds from being shot?), needed a publicity exercise to turn himself into a 'national hero' rather than the lregular pantomine extra ... so a few weeks of "protected" front-line duty in the perimeters of the centuries old British empire. If the intention was really to keep his adventure under cover, the press would not have been told in the first place! Nor would members of his unit be writing home to say he was there (one mother was interviewed by the BBC, day before yesterday!). Hundreds of thousands of innocent people have been massacred in these latest ventures by the American and British imperialists .... it might all be a "bit of a laugh" for Harry and his privileged types, but his presence there, indeed his very existence as a "royal prince" in the 21st Century, is a disgrace to civilized humanity.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Discworld



1889 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  17:20:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I agree Anubis, it is much better to let Afganistan, Iraq, Serbia, Ireland, Pakistan, Kenya and several other countries massacre their own people. They do not need us in there, all we do is draw their fire.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

NewMember
Barsoom



109 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  18:39:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Sorry Anubis, but until I got to your message, all the others were, like me, expressing opinions about whether or not he should have been there, not a publicity exercise. I hear what you say about his existence as a 'royal prince in the 21st Century' - this implies to me that you are not a Royalist! Fair enough, but for me it is not a disgrace to have a royal prince these days, the disgrace is that they no longer have any power, if they ever did, to stand-up for the people of this Country. We are all ruled by Politicians, who prove to us time and time again that we cannot really believe anything they say. With all of the subsequent coverage and lucky photographs of the Prince, I just wonder what other news there is that this is covering up!

"It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do" Jerome K. Jerome

Edited by - NewMember on 02/03/2008 18:41:59
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5303 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  18:51:23  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NewMember

Sorry Anubis, but until I got to your message, all the others were, like me, expressing opinions about whether or not he should have been there, not a publicity exercise. I hear what you say about his existence as a 'royal prince in the 21st Century' - this implies to me that you are not a Royalist! Fair enough, but for me it is not a disgrace to have a royal prince these days, the disgrace is that they no longer have any power, if they ever did, to stand-up for the people of this Country. We are all ruled by Politicians, who prove to us time and time again that we cannot really believe anything they say. With all of the subsequent coverage and lucky photographs of the Prince, I just wonder what other news there is that this is covering up!

The alternative rule is what we had in the days preceding the Magna Carta and subsequent documents when Kings ruled by 'divine right'.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

NewMember
Barsoom



109 Posts

Posted - 02/03/2008 :  19:08:05  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Indeed - and the little people knew their place!

"It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do" Jerome K. Jerome

Edited by - NewMember on 02/03/2008 19:09:04
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



696 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2008 :  12:12:59  Show Profile  Visit moon23's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by camelot

The decision to send him was flawed from the outset. This outcome was inevitable in my opinion. Just like the Iraq war it was unnecessary, inflammatory, and probably based on the same macho thinking...



If he wanted to go then it was right to allow him. He should have just the same rights to do what he wants as everyone else.

The MOD reackon that it's too dangerous now for his fellow soilders, but they could have used it for their advantage.

They could have made pretend guys of Harry by attaching a Ginger wig to a scarecrow and putting it in a tank. This could thus lure the Taliban out as bait and into our ambushes.

The art of war is to use these things to your advantage.


http://www.moon23.wordpress.com

Go to Top of Page

Tombstone Blues
Discworld



1935 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2008 :  12:47:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moon23
They could have made pretend guys of Harry by attaching a Ginger wig to a scarecrow and putting it in a tank. This could thus lure the Taliban out as bait and into our ambushes.

The art of war is to use these things to your advantage.



What a wonderful image!



Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



696 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2008 :  15:09:35  Show Profile  Visit moon23's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tombstone Blues

quote:
Originally posted by moon23
They could have made pretend guys of Harry by attaching a Ginger wig to a scarecrow and putting it in a tank. This could thus lure the Taliban out as bait and into our ambushes.

The art of war is to use these things to your advantage.



What a wonderful image!







Yep, imagine how fun it would be controlling a dummy Prince Harry tank by remote control. You could press a little button to let out random 'Toff' sound effects; here is my suggested list for maximum authenticity:

"Anyone for a game of ruggers",
"Here I am just hanging out with the guys".
"Will said my mother would have been proud"
"Lets have a fancy dress party"



http://www.moon23.wordpress.com

Go to Top of Page

Anubis
Barsoom



231 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2008 :  16:26:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moon23

quote:
Originally posted by Tombstone Blues

quote:
Originally posted by moon23
They could have made pretend guys of Harry by attaching a Ginger wig to a scarecrow and putting it in a tank. This could thus lure the Taliban out as bait and into our ambushes.

The art of war is to use these things to your advantage.



What a wonderful image!








Yep, imagine how fun it would be controlling a dummy Prince Harry tank by remote control. You could press a little button to let out random 'Toff' sound effects; here is my suggested list for maximum authenticity:

"Anyone for a game of ruggers",
"Here I am just hanging out with the guys".
"Will said my mother would have been proud"
"Lets have a fancy dress party"



Brilliant suggestions from Moon 23 -- which, in the light of today's news, namely Harry's suggestion that Terry Tali will now be "out to get Chelsey" as well, there could be two dummy figures in (or on) the tank ... and our minds must boggle when we think what these two dummys might be 'getting up to' (in or on) the tank!?
Go to Top of Page

Fluffy Sheep
Discworld



1159 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2008 :  19:11:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Moon, I do like that quote `The art of war is to use these things to your advantage`. Sounds like an ancient Chinese proverb....?

Row faster, slaves! Caesar wants to waterski!
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 1.14 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free