BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 News
 Local News
 Dreary Flats (Apartments?) for Dyke Road		  New Topic  Reply to Topic
Author Topic  

Control Panel
Discworld


1239 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  15:10:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The dreary flats for Dyke Road are back again. Designs of no distinction whatsoever

http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1612414.0.plans_to_demolish_victorian_building_submitted.php

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  15:55:11  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
They should have let someone who was going to preserve that building, at least the outside facade of it, have it. It was a case where money wasn't everything.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  16:15:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Flats going there is about time.
No Pictures to show that they are a bad design?


Life In The City
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  16:23:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
More bloomin' flats ... Has anyone any idea how many residential units are being proposed in Brighton and how many re currently being built?
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Horseman7
Barsoom



United Kingdom
170 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  17:28:45  Show Profile  Send Horseman7 a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
I recall that Vermin put in an unsuccessful bid to buy the site and convert the existing building into flats.

I wonder if he's still around?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts
Posted - 12/08/2007 :  17:43:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Vermin? I daresay ... shame that his bid wasn't accepted as he showed an awareness of the value of preserving the facade.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1239 Posts
Posted - 13/08/2007 :  17:16:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No surprise that Paul Elgood is getting in on this one.

Again he does not make it clear that there are no LibDems on the Planning Committee, so he commands no clout on the matter whatsoever.
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts
Posted - 13/08/2007 :  17:41:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Too much el and not enough good if you ask me
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts
Posted - 13/08/2007 :  19:45:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Control Panel

No surprise that Paul Elgood is getting in on this one.

Again he does not make it clear that there are no LibDems on the Planning Committee, so he commands no clout on the matter whatsoever.


LibDems coud not plan a piss up in a brewery, so good.
We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

B.O.B.
Alagaësía



81 Posts
Posted - 14/08/2007 :  07:12:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Bog standard and what are those grid metal things projecting from the roof. They won't keep the rain off.
Go to Top of Page

Infinite Poppadum
Discworld



1312 Posts
Posted - 20/08/2007 :  11:29:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Good letter here. The subject of Dyke Road is hotting up. All eyes on the Greens!

Looks as if this one will be thrown out, thank goodness.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/letters/argusletters/display.var.1629603.0.dont_accept_this_blot_on_our_city.php
Go to Top of Page

Infinite Poppadum
Discworld



1312 Posts
Posted - 03/10/2007 :  12:04:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Looks as if these plans have been withdrawn. They have to design a better one.
Go to Top of Page

Infinite Poppadum
Discworld



1312 Posts
Posted - 10/10/2007 :  20:27:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The Argus has only just got this story about the plans being withdrawn - a week after the above posting!
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1239 Posts
Posted - 13/12/2007 :  08:31:29  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Piecve here shows that in some areas a house fetches more as a house than as flats.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/main.jhtml;jsessionid=YR04U02M2DCTTQFIQMFSFF4AVCBQ0IV0?xml=/property/2007/12/11/pflatstofamily111.xml
Go to Top of Page

Reggie Muckraker
Alagaësía



6 Posts
Posted - 30/12/2007 :  12:18:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A new planning application is in - not vastly different from the previous one that Taylor-Wimpey withdrew, but objections have to be in over Christmas and New Year. How convenient for residents.

Interesting to see in Argus reports that Mr. Roger Amerena of the Montpelier and Clifton Hill conservation group so concerned that the main building be preserved. It seems he's changed his tune in recent years. He was all for demolition before ... what a fine conservationist!

FROM THE TRACTOR SEAT OF

REGINALD G. MUCKRAKER

"All The Muck That's Fit To Rake"
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1239 Posts
Posted - 30/12/2007 :  12:28:00  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The Conservatives were all set to pass this but now realise that it would cost them crucial votes in the General Election. So there are moves afoot to replace Brian Oxley as Leader.
Go to Top of Page
  Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 5.23 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free