BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 News
 National News
 Heathrow Protesters
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Topic
Page: of 6

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  19:01:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
BBC London Local News
has said they are going into BA HQ and other area's
this sunday.
They have claimed to be able to mess the Police around.

It would be better if
the High Courts order this waste of a Demo area to move our right now.
Lock them up in a Scottish Jail.

Edited by - long time no see on 16/08/2007 19:02:02
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:10:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Why not fly them to a Chinese jail?

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:35:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Daveb

Why not fly them to a Chinese jail?





Yes
Even Better.
Good point.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:48:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I cannot quite understand with all the "green" taxes around why aviation fuel is not taxed.

I suppose the airport tax gets the passengers but the operators (who would pass it om anyway) do not pay.
Maybe there will be significant rises in airport tax that will get frequent flyers and go straight to government.

If that stopped people flying abroad on holiday that may boost UK holidays and businesses which I guess is better for the UK?

It cannot be that they do not tax it because of the effect on business because that does not stop any other taxes.


We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:53:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thats Easy
Un-Elected Brown is a Neo Conservative New Labour
just like Evil Blair.
Fact.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:56:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Och No laddie
There is more to it than that

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  20:58:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Of course but the PM can change many things
but not this Stinking new Labour one.
Fact.
Go to Top of Page

Tombstone Blues
Earthsea



2239 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  22:37:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by long time no see

Thats Easy
Un-Elected Brown is a Neo Conservative New Labour
just like Evil Blair.
Fact.



But Blair is your Hero
Because of his Great Smoking Ban
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 16/08/2007 :  22:56:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tombstone Blues

But Blair is your Hero
Because of his Great Smoking Ban



That is Off Topic


Do not be so Stupid.

Blair is Evil
and should be Locked away for Life.
Fact.
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  09:42:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Daveb

I cannot quite understand with all the "green" taxes around why aviation fuel is not taxed.

I suppose the airport tax gets the passengers but the operators (who would pass it om anyway) do not pay.
Maybe there will be significant rises in airport tax that will get frequent flyers and go straight to government.

If that stopped people flying abroad on holiday that may boost UK holidays and businesses which I guess is better for the UK?

It cannot be that they do not tax it because of the effect on business because that does not stop any other taxes.





Becuase there is a fear that if you tax aviation fuel then it will hurt the UK economy becuase more planes will fuel up in cheaper places.

This is the problem with globalisation, no government wants to raise tax for fear of losing out on buisness. Therefore all governments try to reduce tax and pay of workers to make thier country look competitive. The big buisnesses get the benifet of cheap labour and low tax and the rich people who own them make even more money whilst the planet and people at the bottom get screwed over.

Many polluting flights are made by rich people who fly many times a year. Bring in a flight allowance and tax these private jets out of existance.

Use the money to improve the train network so we can have fast trains like Japan.
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  09:45:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The pressure is being kept up by the Heros who are fighting for out planets future. Today they blocked the entrance to the Department of Transport.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378527.html

Stinking new labour should act to halt airport expansion

FACT
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  13:27:10  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Moon
"if you tax aviation fuel then it will hurt the UK economy"

I neglected to say it does not stop them raising other taxes on fuel and waste disposal etc whuch could also damage the economy.

So I cannot believe this is the reason.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  13:57:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Daveb

Moon
"if you tax aviation fuel then it will hurt the UK economy"

I neglected to say it does not stop them raising other taxes on fuel and waste disposal etc whuch could also damage the economy.

So I cannot believe this is the reason.




They stoped raising tax on petrol becuase the freight industries block all the depo's in a protest.

The nature of the aviation buisness means that they can fill planes up with fuel overseas etc, it would mean it would be more expensive to fly to Britan.

However this argument needs to be challanged as it is more important to raise taxes and reduce the amount people are flying. Perhaps there could be a higer tax for people who fly regularly.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:27:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
AIRPORT TAX

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:40:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oh no Daveb ... that would be far too simplistic

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:44:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Does it not already exist?
As my post previous.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:47:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I know ... it does and it would be one way of ensuring that it is the frequent flyers that will pay more. I meant it would be far too simplistic for the protest mob. Surely it is far more fun to protest against flying ....

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:53:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder

I know ... it does and it would be one way of ensuring that it is the frequent flyers that will pay more. I meant it would be far too simplistic for the protest mob. Surely it is far more fun to protest against flying ....



Mim your sweeping generalisations about is or isn't too simplistic for the protest Mob is as bad as my disregard for football fans

Many people at the camp would welcome an increase of taxes on frequent flyers.

However this alone isn't going to stop climate change.
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  14:59:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Moon, I have no problem with them protesting. I personally think they are on a hiding to nothing but far be it from me to stop them having their fun. They'd do far better spending their time productively lobbying for an increase in Airport Tax but then, they would never get to camp out and use eco-toilets and get to chain themselves to fences and things.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:01:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder

Moon, I have no problem with them protesting. I personally think they are on a hiding to nothing but far be it from me to stop them having their fun. They'd do far better spending their time productively lobbying for an increase in Airport Tax but then, they would never get to camp out and use eco-toilets and get to chain themselves to fences and things.





Yes
Bang On Right.
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:03:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A Protester has been arressted for failing to give his name under dracoian Sec 44 of the Terroism Act 2000.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378547.html
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:08:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moon23

A Protester has been arressted for failing to give his name under dracoian Sec 44 of the Terroism Act 2000.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378547.html

Why would anyone, going about their lawful business, refuse to give their name to an officer of the law?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

moon23
Calaspia



841 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:20:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A Protester has been arressted for failing to give his name under dracoian Sec 44 of the Terroism Act 2000.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378547.html
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:35:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moon23

A Protester has been arressted for failing to give his name under dracoian Sec 44 of the Terroism Act 2000.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378547.html

Don't look now but you are starting to repeat yourself.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:38:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote





Two Sides
The Heathrow Battle.


Sign Of The Times.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2371 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:53:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Cannot imagine what this nice field will look like when they all go home?

Nice and muddy I suspect. Then what?
A football stadium?

What land are they trespassing on anyway?

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

The Duke of Uranus
Barsoom



294 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  15:59:12  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:



I like the cheap, imported from china, cow biscuit barrel being hung up by the student protester. Made from recycled plastic natch!
Go to Top of Page

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6771 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  16:33:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote


http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=62015&in_page_id=34

The Free Metro paper viewpoint.

Edited by - long time no see on 17/08/2007 16:34:10
Go to Top of Page

The Duke of Uranus
Barsoom



294 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  16:42:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=62015&in_page_id=34


Twats, they really don't do themselves any favours with that kind of "direct action".

Edited by - The Duke of Uranus on 17/08/2007 17:16:34
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6047 Posts

Posted - 17/08/2007 :  16:43:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder

quote:
Originally posted by moon23

A Protester has been arressted for failing to give his name under dracoian Sec 44 of the Terroism Act 2000.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/378547.html

Don't look now but you are starting to repeat yourself.

Nor have you stated why it is so inconceivable that someone going about their lawful business should find it so terrible to give their name to an officer of the law.

Someone who is on dubious moral/ethical grounds ... that I can understand but an individual who believes in the righteousness of his/her cause should be willing to stand up and be counted.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 6 Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 6.33 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free