The letter mentions Mr Arghiros stating that the King Alfred project would be built "at no cost to the city". Perhaps people might recall the councillors and an MP who claimed this development would provide facilities at 'no cost' to residents.
I fully expect a detailed response to this excellent letter by the leader of the council to appear in the argus. So confident of this am I, that I will be holding my breath.
I fully expect a detailed response to this excellent letter by the leader of the council to appear in the argus. So confident of this am I, that I will be holding my breath.
Lets all hold our breath.... .... How about a response from the Council Chief Executive who according to legend has his finger prints all over this project.
So what does the standing down of Cllr Oxley mean for the King Alfred? Will in incoming leader cosy up to Karis or will they attempt to review the development in light of the massive question marks that hang over the decision to grant it's planning permission?
So what does the standing down of Cllr Oxley mean for the King Alfred? Will in incoming leader cosy up to Karis or will they attempt to review the development in light of the massive question marks that hang over the decision to grant it's planning permission?
Probably will be somebody even more pro King Alfred and if not the die is cast and they have given themselves little or no room to manoeuvre.
News here that Gehry's first English creation will not be Hove but a temporary, wooden effort in Hyde Park. The Times reports this - without any mention of the King Alfred!
With this precedent, perhaps Gehry should content himself with rebuilding the beach huts recently lost to the storms. He could probably absorb the Council's £50 charge to remove the wood (unless, ecologically, he re-uses it in situ).
There is a slide show of various buildings designed by Gehry on the same page Furzewick. What I cannot understand is why we get the crumpled beer cans.
Having said that, my objection throughout has been the lack of infra-structure rather then the admittedly highly subjective objection to the specific architecture proposed
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Lack of infrastructure is not just a King Alfred issue but applies to developments from there to the Marina.
There was a suggestion that even those beer cans were copied from another of Gehry's projects. Probably more lucrative and prestigious for him than whatever it is he did for Hove.
Much is written about Gehry and his various projects. Has anyone seen any independent article (not press release fodder) about Gehry that mentions the King Alfred development ?
Lack of infrastructure seems to be an issue throughout the south. I had to drive a friend to Gosport yesterday and I drive another friend all over East and West Sussex. It seems to me that we are building without any thought as to how we are going to support all these residents. It is the very lack of infrastructure was clearly visible throughout.
Gehry's design for the KA is definitely a rip-off of a building he did a few years back ... I think it may be Dallas but I could be wrong there. It is definitely an American building though. And no, I haven't seen any independent articles lauding the man.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Maybe the KA will end up with bits of wood tacked onto it like all the other developments seem to have these days. Why? Is it some kind of nod to ecology. I think it is completely bogus decorative tat and will not weather well. Note Somerhill Avenue, Station site, even in Bexhill opposite the Pavilion. Come to think of it they could have used the stuff washed up on the beach this winter to tack onto the KA building if they had started building it, which I hope is never!
Here is a report about the death of Ken Fines who led the King Alfred objections. Sounds a very nice man. A shame that he did not live to see the scheme collapse.
Mrs Poppadum has heard that Brian Oxley intends to prosecute members of Save Hove for stating that the Council itself is chipping in some £3 million for the "affordable" Karis was meant to supply as part of the misbegotten pool-and-housing deal.
Shouldn't be surprsied if the Council has to pay more.
I've heard that the sports centre will not be free as promised by Karis and the Council has made some serious mistakes in pushing it through so quickly and getting rid of the planners concerned and bringing in actors. What a mess. I might write to the Council and ask if the sports centre is going to be free and see what answer they give.
Isn't this Brian Oxley and Save Hove thing a load of nonsense. What is Save Hove anyway ? Looks like this obscures the serious issue of financial viability of the King Alfred project. Interesting as we have been treated to reports in the Argus recently about almost every other seafront prestige project.
Politicians are like magicians - a good tip for seeing what is going on is when they are enticing you to look to the left, watch out for that juggernaut coming from the right!
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Maybe somebody knows more about this but apparently there is a financial report about King Alfred in the pipeline. Some people recall the last one did not make happy reading. Except the Council proceeded anyway.
Isn't this Brian Oxley and Save Hove thing a load of nonsense. What is Save Hove anyway ? Looks like this obscures the serious issue of financial viability of the King Alfred project. Interesting as we have been treated to reports in the Argus recently about almost every other seafront prestige project.
Save Hove does not seem to have been all that interested in the details of the King Alfred finance but it was always this that was the key element. All comes from trying to do too much with a small site.