Brighton Forum
Brighton Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 News
 Local News
 King Alfred
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Topic
Page: of 20

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 13/07/2008 :  11:13:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Maybe Control Panel put two and two together and came up with four. Namely most new builds are flats - and rather high-rise flats at that.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 13/07/2008 :  12:08:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Most new builds on brown field site will be flats because they are more profitable for devolpers.

At least at KA no work has started and IF, we are lucky then some good may come from it. I susupect however it will fall into neglect and becomes even more of an eyesore.

Whereas the 300 new flats being built in Saltdean have come to a stop, half built. This eyesore will remain for some time.
Luckily it looks like all the social housing will be completed. Deep Joy!

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Furzewick
Barsoom



United Kingdom
150 Posts

Posted - 16/07/2008 :  10:45:43  Show Profile  Visit Furzewick's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
From B.O.B. in the Well, the i360 is coming topic

Will the agreement with Karis become nul and void if Gehry has pulled out and this scheme doesn't get built or have Karis now got hold of the site for the remainder of the lease? What have the Councillors signed away?



Yes, where do the council stand (along with council tax payers money) now the love fest with Gehry is over ?
The whole thing was promoted on the basis of how wonderful Gehry is (was) and what this would do for Brighton ??
Planning permission has been given so what does that mean now ? A sports centre ? A swimming pool ? A block of flats ? A hole in the ground ?

Building Design : Credit crunch threatens Gehry's Hove scheme
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=725&storycode=3117279&c=1&encCode=00000000017ba57c

BBC Retail slowdown hits construction
(Radio 4 File on 4 Radio programme)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7493831.stm

Background Information
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-23aa70c5.html

Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1504 Posts

Posted - 16/07/2008 :  17:09:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
If Karis cannot build according to the plans for which permission was given, then it cannot have any claim upon the land.

Starting over...
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 16/07/2008 :  17:20:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I wonder how much it wil cost us this time around?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 16/07/2008 :  17:30:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Can I run a study? Good Rates!

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 16/07/2008 :  17:33:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'll do it for what he quotes minus 5%

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Furzewick
Barsoom



United Kingdom
150 Posts

Posted - 17/07/2008 :  16:31:57  Show Profile  Visit Furzewick's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Amongst the chaos that is now the Argus website (shameless copy/paste) :

quote:
Chance to grill King Alfred scheme building chief

12:10pm Thursday 17th July 2008

The developer behind the £290 million King Alfred scheme will be answering readers’ questions in the next Friday Inquisition.

Josh Arghiros, of Karis Holdings, hopes to bring life to Frank Gehry’s vision for a new King Alfred Leisure Centre in Hove.

He will be sitting in The Argus hot seat answering questions on anything relating to the controversial development from 11.30am.

The long-awaited initiative includes more than 700 seafront homes and a replacement leisure centre and was approved by Brighton and Hove City Council last year. But its future was thrown into doubt when Mr Arghiros expressed fears an economic downturn could cause financiers ING to back down.


Still talk of 'Frank Gehry's vision'. No news from a recent visit to London reached the Argus ?
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1504 Posts

Posted - 17/07/2008 :  20:59:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Latest Homes has a page about "projects" still likely to go ahead but... the King Alfred is not mentioned.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 29/07/2008 :  14:37:23  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
What a suprise and such a detailed article from the Argus!
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/3555568.King_Alfred_scheme_in_tatters_as_backer_drops_out/

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Furzewick
Barsoom



United Kingdom
150 Posts

Posted - 29/07/2008 :  19:54:40  Show Profile  Visit Furzewick's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Now the link is
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/3555629.King_Alfred_in_doubt_after_bank_drops_out/

Wonder what the difference is between 'tatters' and 'in doubt' ?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 29/07/2008 :  21:16:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, I cannot say I am surprised. Utterly disgusted at the amount of money this fiasco has cost us though.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 29/07/2008 :  21:25:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
All the latest failed or delayed projects have put enough money into the hands of consultants, lawyers and council expenses to build at least one of them.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 29/07/2008 :  22:05:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
And we will not see one single penny back!

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Martha Gunn
Barsoom



255 Posts

Posted - 30/07/2008 :  22:13:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Josh Arghiros is talking about 'sitting down with the council to disscuss the projects future'.

Given the underhand tactic employed by Karis which was aided by the Labour adminstration, I would hope that the Tory administration would bar Karis from ever setting foot inside a council building ever again.

This fiasco has cost the tax payer a huge amount of money, lined the pockets of consultants, deprived Brighton & Hove residents of sports complex that could rival (can you beleive it?) Burgess Hill & Crawley and exposed blatant corruption at work with the council. A particuarly mucky episode in Brighton & Hove's already murky government history.

A line should now be drawn under this with any new proposals for the site being drawn up on a much more managable level.

Yet again, this has exposed Brighton to be all mouth and no trousers. Where is Fanshawe these days?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 30/07/2008 :  22:39:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Brighton being all mouth and no trousers and Fanshawe all trousers and no mouth He has been conspicuous in his silence hasn't he.

(just as an interesting aside, when spellchecked 'Fanshawe' brings up the suggestion 'banshee' )

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Infinite Poppadum
Discworld



1715 Posts

Posted - 31/07/2008 :  10:47:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Mrs Poppadum says that the council is considering other plans for the King Alfred, and is just going through the motions with Karis but has no intention of continuing with that firm which has made the council's reputation all the worse.
Go to Top of Page

B.O.B.
Barsoom



106 Posts

Posted - 31/07/2008 :  12:36:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thank goodness for that at least. Anyone want to design a nice eco friendly sports centre for Hove Seafront. What about the guy who did the library.
Go to Top of Page

nightowl
Barsoom



290 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  09:57:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No future for big developments in Brighton only bus lanes on the coast road, at the cost of £1.8 million what a disaster.
Most of these sites screaming out for development will just be left to be neglected for decades, who wants to invest in Brighton with its self inflicted transport and infrastructure failures.
Change of council is a must now, but who do we vote for in May?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  10:11:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I do quite a bit of driving around in Sussex. I am continually struck by the mess that Brighton is when compared with other locations. Why is it that Crawley manages that which appears to continually elude Brighton?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Martha Gunn
Barsoom



255 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  10:22:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder
Why is it that Crawley manages that which appears to continually elude Brighton?



Because Crawley does not have dellusions of grandeur and simply gets on with trying to provide decent services for its residents.

Brighton, on the other hand, believes itself to be the worlds #1 seaside resort - a culture that perpetuates itself right through Brighton & Hove Council.

This has resulted in millions spent looking at inherently unworkable schemes that has backfired now that the housing boom has ended. lets hope that when there is an economic upturn, there is a more realistic approach. Like, for example, building a brilliant leisure centre on the King Alfred funded by an acceptable, modern hosuing development within the site free of the whole Brad Pitt / Frank Ghery nonsense.

Its amazing that Brighton & Hove Council went all weak at the knees when a Hollywood actors name was casually dropped into the mix who, lets face it, probably couldn't point to Brighton on a map of the UK.
Isn't Brighton cheap and tacky still?
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  10:40:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Sadly Martha I cannot do anything else but agree with you wholeheartedly. I wish it were different and that this was not only a place I called home but a place that called me home; rather then just a beacon to tacky seaside tourism, pretentious architectural posturing and inept public services.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Furzewick
Barsoom



United Kingdom
150 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  11:50:47  Show Profile  Visit Furzewick's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I agree with Martha Gunn's recent posts.

Somebody noted the silence from Fanshawe (probably now in his Scottish home town Edinburgh). However the 'delusions of grandeur' and the 'unworkable schemes' where obvious many years ago and well before the current economic circumstances. Where are the many people who without question supported this (and other) projects ?

Interesting that Gehry's recent comments about the Hove project are well documented but we still hear that they want him to redesign it.
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  13:27:24  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I am sure this has been said before.
Brightons road system is inherently flawed. All roads lead to a hub on the coast, therefore access and exit are limited. By making the road even narrower with build outs and bus lanes flow can only decrease.

This will only improve if less people travel in by car which is possibly part of an ultimate plan to rid the roads of B&H of all cars?

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  13:36:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Not really conducive with the promotion of Brighton as a resort of destination for the day trippers though is it?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Infinite Poppadum
Discworld



1715 Posts

Posted - 22/08/2008 :  07:38:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Frank Gehry is too busy to work on a theatre in Brooklyn. So he is unlikely indeed to pick up any threads in Hove.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/theater/22gehr.html?_r=1&ref=arts&oref=slogin
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 22/08/2008 :  07:56:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I have said this before ... the Gehry buildings that were proposed for that poor site were merely rehashes of buildings he had put up elsewhere (Dallas being one place that jumps to mind). I doubt Gehry ever really had any personal involvement with B&H. Could he even find it on a map?

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Control Panel
Discworld



1504 Posts

Posted - 31/08/2008 :  10:06:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
If the Edwardian swimming pool in Marshall Street, Soho, can be restored for re-opening in 2011, then perhaps it is not so very hard to make something of the current King Alfred.
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6640 Posts

Posted - 31/08/2008 :  10:52:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The thing is ... our council is far more focused on bringing tourism and businesses; not that their rather hotchpotch approach is doing much to attain that. Nah, there is not a single iota of political will regarding the improvement of facilities for local residents. What was it Martha Gunn said; something about style over substance? The trouble is that we have a strong executive and weak councillors who, in the main are more concerned with staying on the right side of the executive.

So there you have it, a load of paid employees who are so protected that they are never answerable for any of the grave errors of judgement or pure plain and simple inability to do the job they are paid for on the one hand. And a weak governing body in the shape of by and large - and with a few notable exceptions - councillors who are more concerned with advancing their political careers in their various parties then the residents they are supposed to represent.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Earthsea



2823 Posts

Posted - 31/08/2008 :  10:58:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
If the council tried I am sure they could get a few million from the lottery fund to refurbish.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 20 Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
Brighton Forum © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.55 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free