BrightonLiveWire
BrightonLiveWire
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 News
 National News
 Culling of patients..?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Author Topic  

nightowl
Barsoom


249 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  16:38:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7065010.stm

So is this the way to deal with the ageing population culling the weak and vulnerable, don't like this one bit, nurses should not be asked to make such decisions on life and death.....

long time no see
Earthsea



United Kingdom
6457 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  16:59:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Some Nurses
want this.


Sign Of The Times.
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5323 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  18:00:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
To call it a cull is ludicrous.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Daveb
Discworld



1896 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  18:15:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Sounds ok to me.

We're all doomed!
Head for the hills before they start heading for you!
Go to Top of Page

nightowl
Barsoom



249 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  20:39:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Miriam Binder

To call it a cull is ludicrous.



Try "eradicate" or "terminate" the end result is the same......


http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/weird/nurse/12.html

Edited by - nightowl on 27/10/2007 20:44:34
Go to Top of Page

Miriam Binder
Earthsea



United Kingdom
5323 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  22:08:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
There is nothing to indicate that allowing nurses to determine if and when resuscitation should be attempted would necessarily mean that fewer people would be resuscitated. Therefore this does not indicate that this is a 'cull' of patients. It is a cost cutting exercise, commensurate with the proposal to allow qualified nurses to conduct abortions for instance.


Yes, there have been some nurses that kill, just as there have been some doctors that kill. Remember Drs Harold Shipman, Michael Swango, Thomas Neill Cream and others.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin
Go to Top of Page

Fluffy Sheep
Discworld



1165 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2007 :  22:27:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
We debated this one at work today. The only nurse who was all for it is a temporary colleague, NOT the most sensitive or mature person - and I say God Forbid that someone like that should ever be given a say in the matter, let alone the onus of decision!
The present situation, is that YES, nurses have more close contact with the patient than doctors, and already give some feedback and observation on the consultants` rounds. Where resuscitation would definitely not be in the patient`s interest, this should already be recognised, discussed with family and a `DNAR` (do not attempt resuscitation)orange form completed by the doctor. If there`s an orange form that hasn`t been reviewed and the patient is gradually improving, it is NOW up to the nurse to bring it to the doctor`s attention, and the `DNAR` status is either rescinded or renewed, depending on what is deemed best for the patient. I Think that`s taking the nurse`s role in this quite far enough already.

Row faster, slaves! Caesar wants to waterski!
Go to Top of Page
  Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
BrightonLiveWire © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free